tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
Athlytics vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Athlytics and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
Athlytics vs webmockr: at a glance
What is Athlytics?
A Strava analytics package spent its 1.0 cycle surviving rOpenSci review, not adding features.
Athlytics computes endurance-training metrics — ACWR, EWMA load, efficiency factor, decoupling, personal bests — from Strava exports. Every release in view is review-driven: test-suite consolidation, dataset renames, styler passes, and a substantial robustness pass over the metric calculations and stream parsers. 1.0.6 explicitly changes nothing but packaging metadata.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
Athlytics vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
Athlytics
0.0ANALYTICS
A Strava analytics package spent its 1.0 cycle surviving rOpenSci review, not adding features.
◆ Current state
Athlytics computes endurance-training metrics — ACWR, EWMA load, efficiency factor, decoupling, personal bests — from Strava exports. Every release in view is review-driven: test-suite consolidation, dataset renames, styler passes, and a substantial robustness pass over the metric calculations and stream parsers. 1.0.6 explicitly changes nothing but packaging metadata.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is optimising for credibility rather than surface area. It completed rOpenSci peer review, moved to an offline ZIP export workflow with hardened TCX/GPX parsing, corrected the EWMA half-life mapping, and deliberately softened its ACWR language away from injury-risk claims. Version numbers are also being published out of order, which makes the feed a poor guide to what shipped when.
◆ Prediction
With review complete and packaging metadata frozen for archival, the next substantive release is more likely to extend metric coverage or data sources than to continue polishing; nothing in these entries points to a specific new metric.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to Athlytics and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Athlytics or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all Athlytics alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from Athlytics and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agoAthlyticsPackaging metadata standardised for archival
- 2mo agoAthlyticsrOpenSci peer review completed; test suite consolidated
- 2mo agoAthlyticsACWR and stream parsing corrected for real-world exports
- 6mo agoAthlyticsv1.0.2: Documentation & Review Fixes
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Athlytics and webmockr?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. Athlytics and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Athlytics better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Athlytics and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Athlytics?
Top Athlytics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Athlytics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/athlytics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.