osmapiR
osmapiR is the rare API client that tracks its server's wiki revision numbers in the changelog.
Comparison · Analytics
Athlytics vs osmextract
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Athlytics and osmextract — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Athlytics vs osmextract: at a glance
What is Athlytics?
A Strava analytics package spent its 1.0 cycle surviving rOpenSci review, not adding features.
Athlytics computes endurance-training metrics — ACWR, EWMA load, efficiency factor, decoupling, personal bests — from Strava exports. Every release in view is review-driven: test-suite consolidation, dataset renames, styler passes, and a substantial robustness pass over the metric calculations and stream parsers. 1.0.6 explicitly changes nothing but packaging metadata.
What is osmextract?
osmextract stopped throwing your OpenStreetMap downloads away at the end of every session.
osmextract downloads OpenStreetMap extracts from Geofabrik, BBBike and openstreetmap.fr and translates them into sf objects via GDAL. The 0.6.0 release moved its download cache from `tempdir()` to a persistent `tools::R_user_dir()` location and raised the R floor to 4.1.0 to get it. It also made spatial `place` inputs self-clipping: pass an sf or bbox object and the boundary is now set to match, so only the relevant slice of a country-sized extract is processed.
Athlytics vs osmextract: editorial side-by-side
Athlytics
0.0ANALYTICS
A Strava analytics package spent its 1.0 cycle surviving rOpenSci review, not adding features.
◆ Current state
Athlytics computes endurance-training metrics — ACWR, EWMA load, efficiency factor, decoupling, personal bests — from Strava exports. Every release in view is review-driven: test-suite consolidation, dataset renames, styler passes, and a substantial robustness pass over the metric calculations and stream parsers. 1.0.6 explicitly changes nothing but packaging metadata.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is optimising for credibility rather than surface area. It completed rOpenSci peer review, moved to an offline ZIP export workflow with hardened TCX/GPX parsing, corrected the EWMA half-life mapping, and deliberately softened its ACWR language away from injury-risk claims. Version numbers are also being published out of order, which makes the feed a poor guide to what shipped when.
◆ Prediction
With review complete and packaging metadata frozen for archival, the next substantive release is more likely to extend metric coverage or data sources than to continue polishing; nothing in these entries points to a specific new metric.
osmextract
0.0ANALYTICS
osmextract stopped throwing your OpenStreetMap downloads away at the end of every session.
◆ Current state
osmextract downloads OpenStreetMap extracts from Geofabrik, BBBike and openstreetmap.fr and translates them into sf objects via GDAL. The 0.6.0 release moved its download cache from `tempdir()` to a persistent `tools::R_user_dir()` location and raised the R floor to 4.1.0 to get it. It also made spatial `place` inputs self-clipping: pass an sf or bbox object and the boundary is now set to match, so only the relevant slice of a country-sized extract is processed.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through every release. One is chasing GDAL — SQL syntax adjusted for 3.10, ogr2ogr options fixed for 3.9, and an `osmconf.ini` that 0.6.0 finally keeps automatically in sync with whatever sf or GDAL provides rather than shipping a snapshot. The other is the road-network extraction added experimentally in 0.3.1, which has been quietly accumulating real routing semantics since: `access = no` links retained when the mode-specific tag permits them, a `oneway` column by default for driving, and `motor_vehicle` always included.
◆ Prediction
Given that `oe_get_network()` has gained transport-mode detail in three separate releases while remaining flagged as experimental, the next substantive work is most likely there — either more modes or a formal exit from experimental status.
Alternatives to Athlytics and osmextract
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Athlytics or osmextract.
ymlthis
ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.
forestly
forestly built an interactive safety review tool, then taught it to produce submission-ready RTF.
pharmaverseadam
pharmaverseadam is the pharmaverse's test-data mirror, and it now covers neurology.
pkglite
pkglite's whole job is knowing which files in an R package are text — and it keeps getting better at guessing.
gMCPLite
gMCPLite exists to be gMCP without Java, and its releases guard that boundary rather than extend it.
See all Athlytics alternatives → · See all osmextract alternatives →
Recent activity from Athlytics and osmextract
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agoAthlyticsPackaging metadata standardised for archival
- 2mo agoAthlyticsrOpenSci peer review completed; test suite consolidated
- 2mo agoAthlyticsACWR and stream parsing corrected for real-world exports
- 4mo agoosmextractDownloads move to a persistent cache outside tempdir ⚡
- 6mo agoAthlyticsv1.0.2: Documentation & Review Fixes
- 1y agoosmextractoe_match gains a version argument for historical extracts
- 1y agoosmextractRouting semantics sharpen for driving and restricted-access links
- 2y agoosmextract51 new openstreetmap.fr regions and a GDAL 3.9 fix
- 3y agoosmextractNon-Geofabrik downloads were saved under the wrong filename
- 3y agoosmextractHelp files regenerated for valid HTML5
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Athlytics and osmextract?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Athlytics and osmextract are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Athlytics better than osmextract?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Athlytics and osmextract are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Athlytics?
Top Athlytics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Athlytics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/athlytics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to osmextract?
Top osmextract alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "osmextract alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/osmextract for the full list with editorial commentary on each.