← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ardlverse vs distributional

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ardlverse and distributional — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

ardlverse vs distributional: at a glance

Featureardlversedistributional
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeseconometrics, panel-data, ardl, r-packager-package, probability-distributions, distribution-arithmetic, numerical-methods
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ardlverse?

An outside audit against Stata found seven errors in ardlverse's panel estimator, including regressions with no intercept.

A small R package for autoregressive distributed lag models, with only three releases on record. The first two were administrative — a CRAN version note and a Zenodo metadata update. The third, 2.0.0, is a correction release built entirely from an external audit of panel_ardl() against Stata's xtpmg, and it is the only entry here with substantive content.

Read the full ardlverse trajectory →

What is distributional?

distributional taught + and - to work on any pair of distributions, closing the algebra it started with.

The R package providing vectorised distribution objects — the substrate that forecasting and anomaly tooling in the same ecosystem builds on. Cadence has picked up sharply, with four releases in the six months to June 2026 against roughly one a year before that. Two kinds of work alternate: adding distribution families (Dirichlet, Horseshoe, Laplace, multivariate t, g-and-k, the extreme-value pair) and deepening what can be computed generically across all of them.

Read the full distributional trajectory →

ardlverse vs distributional: editorial side-by-side

A
ardlverse
ANALYTICS
0.0

An outside audit against Stata found seven errors in ardlverse's panel estimator, including regressions with no intercept.

◆ Current state

A small R package for autoregressive distributed lag models, with only three releases on record. The first two were administrative — a CRAN version note and a Zenodo metadata update. The third, 2.0.0, is a correction release built entirely from an external audit of panel_ardl() against Stata's xtpmg, and it is the only entry here with substantive content.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's direction is now set by verification against an established reference implementation rather than by feature work. The seven fixes bring panel_ardl() into strict alignment with the original Pesaran, Shin and Smith framework, and the most serious of them is structural: internal regressions used lm.fit(), which unlike lm() does not append an intercept, so every short-run regression across the PMG, MG and DFE estimators was forced through the origin. Design matrices now carry a column of ones and DFE reconstructs the grand-mean intercept to match standard fixed-effects output.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next releases to extend the same audit approach to the remaining estimators, since a package that has been validated against xtpmg on one function invites the same question about the rest.

D0.0

distributional taught + and - to work on any pair of distributions, closing the algebra it started with.

◆ Current state

The R package providing vectorised distribution objects — the substrate that forecasting and anomaly tooling in the same ecosystem builds on. Cadence has picked up sharply, with four releases in the six months to June 2026 against roughly one a year before that. Two kinds of work alternate: adding distribution families (Dirichlet, Horseshoe, Laplace, multivariate t, g-and-k, the extreme-value pair) and deepening what can be computed generically across all of them.

◆ Where it's heading

The generic-computation thread is the one that matters and it has been building steadily: a Monte Carlo default method for cdf(), has_symmetry() to let algorithms specialise, hdr() moving to exact results for symmetric distributions and 4096 quantiles elsewhere, open-versus-closed support intervals. Version 0.8.0 is where that thread arrives somewhere — arithmetic on arbitrary distributions, with closed forms used when they exist and numerical convolution when they do not. The package is positioning itself as a computational layer rather than a catalogue, which is consistent with how weird and the forecasting packages consume it.

◆ Prediction

Expect the numerical machinery behind dist_convolved() to be reused for other operators, and more generics like has_symmetry() that let downstream algorithms take exact paths when a distribution supports them.

Alternatives to ardlverse and distributional

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ardlverse or distributional.

See all ardlverse alternatives → · See all distributional alternatives →

Recent activity from ardlverse and distributional

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoardlverseSeven panel_ardl fixes after an audit against Stata's xtpmg
  2. 1mo agodistributionalConditional S3 registration so the package loads on R before 4.3
  3. 1mo agodistributionalDistribution arithmetic: FFT convolution behind the + and - operators
  4. 2mo agodistributionalVectorised p in quantile() for inflated distributions; open brackets on infinite bounds
  5. 5mo agoardlverseZenodo metadata updated with ORCID
  6. 5mo agoardlverseardlverse v1.1.3
  7. 5mo agodistributionalDirichlet and Horseshoe distributions added
  8. 7mo agodistributionalhas_symmetry() generic, exact HDRs for symmetric distributions
  9. 1y agodistributionalMonte Carlo cdf() default method; g-and-k, g-and-h and extreme-value families

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ardlverse and distributional?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. ardlverse and distributional are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ardlverse better than distributional?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ardlverse and distributional are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ardlverse?

Top ardlverse alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ardlverse alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ardlverse-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to distributional?

Top distributional alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "distributional alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/distributional-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.