qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
Comparison · Analytics
APCalign vs constants
A side-by-side editorial comparison of APCalign and constants — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
APCalign vs constants: at a glance
What is APCalign?
APCalign spent this year fixing the counts it had been quietly getting wrong
APCalign standardises Australian plant names against the APC and APNI taxonomic resources and derives state-level native/introduced status from them. The feed is GitHub releases tagged by resource download date rather than semantic version, so titles carry no information about content. The two 2026 releases are the only substantive ones in the window: infrataxa support in the diversity functions, then a fix for a grep that had been matching the wrong columns.
What is constants?
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.
APCalign vs constants: editorial side-by-side
APCalign
2.5ANALYTICS
APCalign spent this year fixing the counts it had been quietly getting wrong
◆ Current state
APCalign standardises Australian plant names against the APC and APNI taxonomic resources and derives state-level native/introduced status from them. The feed is GitHub releases tagged by resource download date rather than semantic version, so titles carry no information about content. The two 2026 releases are the only substantive ones in the window: infrataxa support in the diversity functions, then a fix for a grep that had been matching the wrong columns.
◆ Where it's heading
Development is driven by users reporting that outputs do not match what they expect, and the fixes keep landing in the same two functions — create_species_state_origin_matrix() and native_anywhere_in_australia(). The infrataxa parameter and the reordered output columns came from user requests; the guard-ordering and grep fixes came from a filed issue. What is emerging is that the origin-matrix logic was written loosely and is now being tightened case by case, with tests and state diversity benchmarks added alongside.
◆ Prediction
Both recent releases touched the same pair of functions and the fixes were found by inspection rather than by tests failing, so more corrections in the native-status path are the likely next content — the benchmarks added in March are the mechanism that would surface them.
constants
0.0ANALYTICS
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
◆ Current state
constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction set at 1.0.0 was to stop being a curated convenience wrapper and become a mechanical mirror of NIST. Hand-crafted symbol names were replaced with NIST's own ASCII symbols, categories adopted NIST's, and uncertainty switched from relative to absolute — all framed by the maintainer as necessary to make future CODATA updates routine. On top of that the package gained a correlation matrix and optional integration with the quantities package, moving it from a lookup table toward something that can propagate uncertainty.
◆ Prediction
Having rebuilt the symbol table specifically so CODATA revisions become mechanical, the next substantive release most likely tracks a new CODATA dataset rather than adding API. The experimental correlated-value support, disabled by default at 1.0.0, is the one part these entries flag as unfinished.
Alternatives to APCalign and constants
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either APCalign or constants.
austraits
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
ggdemetra
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
fossilsim
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
tern.rbmi
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
tern.mmrm
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
See all APCalign alternatives → · See all constants alternatives →
Recent activity from APCalign and constants
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 16d agoAPCalignAPCalign fixes a grep that scanned taxon names for native status
- 4mo agoAPCalignAPCalign adds infrataxa to the state origin and diversity functions
- 1y agoAPCalignTaxonomic resource snapshot from APC and APNI
- 1y agoAPCalignRelease tags switch to APC download date
- 1y agoAPCalignFix for the quiet option
- 5y agoconstantsCompatibility fix for units 0.7-0
- 5y agoconstantsconstants 1.0.0 ⚡
- 8y agoconstantsUnit handling fixes ahead of the 1.0.0 rebuild
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between APCalign and constants?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. APCalign is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is APCalign better than constants?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. APCalign is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to APCalign?
Top APCalign alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "APCalign alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/apcalign-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to constants?
Top constants alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "constants alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/constants-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.