← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

antaresread vs tglkmeans

A side-by-side editorial comparison of antaresread and tglkmeans — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

antaresread vs tglkmeans: at a glance

Featureantaresreadtglkmeans
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, energy-modeling, api-compatibility, breaking-changesr-package, clustering, missing-data, correctness
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is antaresread?

The R reader for Antares Simulator studies, pinned to whatever the simulator ships next

antaresRead loads Antares Simulator studies from disk or the Antares Web API into R. Its release history maps one-to-one onto simulator versions: 2.9.2 for Antares 9.2, 2.9.3 for 9.3, and the 3.0.x line for the study-format changes that followed. The recurring work is the converted study version format (9.0 becoming 900) which has now been fixed or re-fixed in three consecutive releases, and 3.1.0 turns that churn into a declared breaking change as Antares Web 2.33.0 introduces yet another numbering scheme.

Read the full antaresread trajectory →

What is tglkmeans?

A k-means implementation that just told users their Spearman clustering on missing data was wrong

tglkmeans is a multi-core k-means implementation with seeding, aimed at single-cell and other large matrix workloads. Version 0.4.0 flipped the id_column default and moved to R's random number generator, 0.5.x added count-matrix downsampling and fixed id handling, and 0.6.3 in May 2026 is a correctness release: Spearman distance was ranking missing values as the largest value instead of dropping them, and predict_tgl_kmeans() with Euclidean distance did not reproduce the training metric when a cluster center had a missing dimension.

Read the full tglkmeans trajectory →

antaresread vs tglkmeans: editorial side-by-side

A
antaresread
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R reader for Antares Simulator studies, pinned to whatever the simulator ships next

◆ Current state

antaresRead loads Antares Simulator studies from disk or the Antares Web API into R. Its release history maps one-to-one onto simulator versions: 2.9.2 for Antares 9.2, 2.9.3 for 9.3, and the 3.0.x line for the study-format changes that followed. The recurring work is the converted study version format (9.0 becoming 900) which has now been fixed or re-fixed in three consecutive releases, and 3.1.0 turns that churn into a declared breaking change as Antares Web 2.33.0 introduces yet another numbering scheme.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is a compatibility layer whose roadmap is set entirely upstream, and version identity is where it keeps getting cut. The same .getSimOptionsAPI() version-format fix appears in 3.0.0, 3.0.1 and again in 3.1.0 — three passes at one problem, which suggests the API and disk representations of a study version have not converged. Alongside that, API-mode work is displacing disk-mode work: dedicated endpoints for output listing, district definitions, per-area output handling.

◆ Prediction

The next release will most likely track the following Antares Simulator or Antares Web version, and given the 3.1.0 breaking change, a follow-up correcting the new numbering scheme is a reasonable expectation.

T
tglkmeans
ANALYTICS
0.0

A k-means implementation that just told users their Spearman clustering on missing data was wrong

◆ Current state

tglkmeans is a multi-core k-means implementation with seeding, aimed at single-cell and other large matrix workloads. Version 0.4.0 flipped the id_column default and moved to R's random number generator, 0.5.x added count-matrix downsampling and fixed id handling, and 0.6.3 in May 2026 is a correctness release: Spearman distance was ranking missing values as the largest value instead of dropping them, and predict_tgl_kmeans() with Euclidean distance did not reproduce the training metric when a cluster center had a missing dimension.

◆ Where it's heading

The package handles missing data across three distance metrics, and 0.6.3 shows those paths had drifted apart — Spearman behaved unlike Euclidean and Pearson, and prediction behaved unlike training. Both fixes change results on affected data, and the release notes are careful to bound exactly where: Spearman on data with NAs changes, complete data does not. Performance work runs alongside, with the dense per-thread vote matrix removed from the reassignment step.

◆ Prediction

With the metric paths now aligned on missing-value handling, further work is more likely to target the parallel reassignment internals than the distance semantics.

Alternatives to antaresread and tglkmeans

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either antaresread or tglkmeans.

See all antaresread alternatives → · See all tglkmeans alternatives →

Recent activity from antaresread and tglkmeans

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoantaresreadBreaking: new API study-version numbering from Antares Web 2.33.0
  2. 2mo agotglkmeansSpearman metric no longer ranks missing values as the largest
  3. 2mo agoantaresreadReads the new MIN GEN thermal output variable from Antares 9.2
  4. 6mo agoantaresreadFixes area output imports for Antares 9.3 studies
  5. 6mo agoantaresreadVersion bump for CRAN release
  6. 9mo agoantaresreadAdds support for Antares Simulator 9.3 studies
  7. 10mo agoantaresreadAdds read_storages_constraints() for Antares 9.2 storage constraints
  8. 2y agotglkmeansFixes corrupted cluster ids and dropped dimnames
  9. 2y agotglkmeansAdds downsample_matrix() for count matrices
  10. 2y agotglkmeansBreaking: id_column defaults to FALSE, switches to R's RNG

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between antaresread and tglkmeans?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. antaresread and tglkmeans are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is antaresread better than tglkmeans?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. antaresread and tglkmeans are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to antaresread?

Top antaresread alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "antaresread alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/antaresread for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tglkmeans?

Top tglkmeans alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tglkmeans alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tglkmeans for the full list with editorial commentary on each.