fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
antaresread vs robma
A side-by-side editorial comparison of antaresread and robma — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
antaresread vs robma: at a glance
What is antaresread?
The R reader for Antares Simulator studies, pinned to whatever the simulator ships next
antaresRead loads Antares Simulator studies from disk or the Antares Web API into R. Its release history maps one-to-one onto simulator versions: 2.9.2 for Antares 9.2, 2.9.3 for 9.3, and the 3.0.x line for the study-format changes that followed. The recurring work is the converted study version format (9.0 becoming 900) which has now been fixed or re-fixed in three consecutive releases, and 3.1.0 turns that churn into a declared breaking change as Antares Web 2.33.0 introduces yet another numbering scheme.
What is robma?
RoBMA 4.0 tears out its own constructor surface and rebuilds on one class hierarchy
RoBMA fits robust Bayesian model-averaged meta-analyses that adjust for publication bias. The 3.x line grew by accretion: separate constructors for each model family (RoBMA.reg, NoBMA, BiBMA and their .reg variants), a spike-and-slab algorithm in 3.3.0 that made estimation fast enough to matter, then a steady stream of post-estimation tooling gated on that algorithm — heterogeneity summaries, residuals, funnel plots, z-curve conversion, predict, extract, pooled and adjusted effects. Version 4.0.0 in May 2026 collapses all of it into a unified brma class hierarchy.
antaresread vs robma: editorial side-by-side
antaresread
0.0ANALYTICS
The R reader for Antares Simulator studies, pinned to whatever the simulator ships next
◆ Current state
antaresRead loads Antares Simulator studies from disk or the Antares Web API into R. Its release history maps one-to-one onto simulator versions: 2.9.2 for Antares 9.2, 2.9.3 for 9.3, and the 3.0.x line for the study-format changes that followed. The recurring work is the converted study version format (9.0 becoming 900) which has now been fixed or re-fixed in three consecutive releases, and 3.1.0 turns that churn into a declared breaking change as Antares Web 2.33.0 introduces yet another numbering scheme.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is a compatibility layer whose roadmap is set entirely upstream, and version identity is where it keeps getting cut. The same .getSimOptionsAPI() version-format fix appears in 3.0.0, 3.0.1 and again in 3.1.0 — three passes at one problem, which suggests the API and disk representations of a study version have not converged. Alongside that, API-mode work is displacing disk-mode work: dedicated endpoints for output listing, district definitions, per-area output handling.
◆ Prediction
The next release will most likely track the following Antares Simulator or Antares Web version, and given the 3.1.0 breaking change, a follow-up correcting the new numbering scheme is a reasonable expectation.
robma
0.0ANALYTICS
RoBMA 4.0 tears out its own constructor surface and rebuilds on one class hierarchy
◆ Current state
RoBMA fits robust Bayesian model-averaged meta-analyses that adjust for publication bias. The 3.x line grew by accretion: separate constructors for each model family (RoBMA.reg, NoBMA, BiBMA and their .reg variants), a spike-and-slab algorithm in 3.3.0 that made estimation fast enough to matter, then a steady stream of post-estimation tooling gated on that algorithm — heterogeneity summaries, residuals, funnel plots, z-curve conversion, predict, extract, pooled and adjusted effects. Version 4.0.0 in May 2026 collapses all of it into a unified brma class hierarchy.
◆ Where it's heading
The 3.x series solved the modeling problem and left an interface problem behind: a caller had to know which of six constructors matched their data type, and argument names differed across them. 4.0.0 resolves that by making the model family a set of arguments rather than a function name, and by standardizing input naming on metafor-style conventions. It shipped one day after BayesTools 0.3.0, the author's own upstream infrastructure package, whose new standardization and prior-transformation machinery this rewrite depends on.
◆ Prediction
A rewrite this wide usually needs a follow-up, so expect 4.0.x patches addressing migration gaps as users hit the removed constructors and renamed arguments.
Alternatives to antaresread and robma
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either antaresread or robma.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
See all antaresread alternatives → · See all robma alternatives →
Recent activity from antaresread and robma
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoantaresreadBreaking: new API study-version numbering from Antares Web 2.33.0
- 2mo agoantaresreadReads the new MIN GEN thermal output variable from Antares 9.2
- 3mo agorobmaUnifies six model constructors into one brma class hierarchy ⚡
- 6mo agoantaresreadFixes area output imports for Antares 9.3 studies
- 6mo agoantaresreadVersion bump for CRAN release
- 8mo agorobmaRoBMA 3.6.1
- 9mo agoantaresreadAdds support for Antares Simulator 9.3 studies
- 10mo agoantaresreadAdds read_storages_constraints() for Antares 9.2 storage constraints
- 11mo agorobmaRoBMA 3.6.0
- 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.5.1
- 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.5.0
- 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.4.0
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between antaresread and robma?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. antaresread and robma are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is antaresread better than robma?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. antaresread and robma are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to antaresread?
Top antaresread alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "antaresread alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/antaresread for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to robma?
Top robma alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "robma alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/robma for the full list with editorial commentary on each.