soilDBdata
soilDBdata exists so soilDB's tests can run without a NASIS connection.
Comparison · Analytics
aniprocess vs invasimapr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of aniprocess and invasimapr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r package
aniprocess vs invasimapr: at a glance
What is aniprocess?
aniprocess rebuilt its filter API into three tiers and removed the old one outright.
aniprocess is the signal-processing half of the animovement ecosystem for animal movement data — smoothing, outlier flagging and gap handling for tracking coordinates. Version 0.3.0 restructured the entire public interface into three tiers: bare functions over a vector or a frame of coordinate columns, *_with() to select a method by name, and *_across() to apply one to a whole aniframe. Two functions were removed rather than deprecated, and argument names were normalized across the package.
What is invasimapr?
invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.
invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.
aniprocess vs invasimapr: editorial side-by-side
aniprocess
3.8ANALYTICS
aniprocess rebuilt its filter API into three tiers and removed the old one outright.
◆ Current state
aniprocess is the signal-processing half of the animovement ecosystem for animal movement data — smoothing, outlier flagging and gap handling for tracking coordinates. Version 0.3.0 restructured the entire public interface into three tiers: bare functions over a vector or a frame of coordinate columns, *_with() to select a method by name, and *_across() to apply one to a whole aniframe. Two functions were removed rather than deprecated, and argument names were normalized across the package.
◆ Where it's heading
The redesign pushes aniframe metadata into the processing layer — *_across() reads sampling rate and the time column off the object instead of asking the caller, which is the division of labour aniframe's own class work assumes. Defaults are shifting toward not destroying information: filters preserve gaps unless inferring across them is the point, and a missing confidence score now warns rather than being read as a poor one. The bug fixes tell a consistent per-group story, with speed computed within each track so a step never forms across a track boundary.
◆ Prediction
With the across-style API landed and issue #29 (filter_by_pose) still open, the next release most likely extends the same three-tier pattern to pose data rather than adding more filters.
invasimapr
0.0ANALYTICS
invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.
◆ Current state
invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.
◆ Where it's heading
The pressure is toward being installable and auditable rather than more capable — install slimmed from roughly 100 MB to 56 MB, R CMD check warnings and notes resolved, sp moved to Suggests, a Darwin Core-aligned data dictionary added, and a Zenodo concept DOI with CITATION.cff, codemeta.json and .zenodo.json. The package moves in lockstep with its B-Cubed sibling dissmapr, tagged within minutes of each other at both 0.1.0 and 0.2.1, which points at project-level standards deadlines rather than independent release decisions. Trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration remain on the roadmap.
◆ Prediction
Standards compliance is now complete and the roadmap names functional trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration tools, so the next release is the first that can plausibly be about invasion ecology rather than packaging.
Alternatives to aniprocess and invasimapr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either aniprocess or invasimapr.
collinear
collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.
nert
nert put fourteen TERN datasets behind one dispatcher and called it stable.
scTypeEval
scTypeEval judges single-cell annotations without needing a ground truth to judge them against.
medrobust
medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.
probmed
probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.
See all aniprocess alternatives → · See all invasimapr alternatives →
Recent activity from aniprocess and invasimapr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2d agoaniprocessThree-tier filter API; filter_aniframe() removed ⚡
- 1mo agoinvasimaprVersion bump; notes identical to 0.2.0
- 1mo agoinvasimaprB-Cubed standards alignment; install slimmed to 56 MB
- 1mo agoinvasimaprinvasimapr v0.1.0: First citable release
- 3mo agoaniprocessCCMA, excursion and Gaussian filters; FFT passband fix
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between aniprocess and invasimapr?
Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. aniprocess is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is aniprocess better than invasimapr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. aniprocess is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to aniprocess?
Top aniprocess alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "aniprocess alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/aniprocess for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to invasimapr?
Top invasimapr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "invasimapr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/invasimapr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.