← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ageproR vs shapviz

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ageproR and shapviz — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ageproR vs shapviz: at a glance

FeatureageproRshapviz
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesfisheries-science, stock-assessment, r-package, file-format-validationshap, visualization, model explainability, ggplot2
Last editorial update1h ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ageproR?

ageproR spent two years chasing a moving file format, then added the recruitment models that justify the effort.

An R interface for building and validating AGEPRO input files — the configuration format for a fisheries stock projection program used in stock assessments. Releases come every few months and are dominated by one recurring problem: keeping up with the AGEPRO input file format, which has moved between VERSION 4.0 and VERSION 4.25 in both directions across this window. The package spends considerable effort on validation, version detection, and clear error messages when a file does not match.

Read the full ageproR trajectory →

What is shapviz?

shapviz refines its SHAP plots release by release while chasing ggplot2's moving target.

shapviz turns SHAP values from XGBoost, LightGBM, H2O, kernelshap and other sources into standard diagnostic plots — importance, dependence, waterfall, force and interaction. Recent work is plot ergonomics: shared y-axis control across dependence plots, a bar view for interaction values, and axis collection via patchwork. The two most recent releases are pure compatibility and bug fixes.

Read the full shapviz trajectory →

ageproR vs shapviz: editorial side-by-side

A
ageproR
ANALYTICS
0.0

ageproR spent two years chasing a moving file format, then added the recruitment models that justify the effort.

◆ Current state

An R interface for building and validating AGEPRO input files — the configuration format for a fisheries stock projection program used in stock assessments. Releases come every few months and are dominated by one recurring problem: keeping up with the AGEPRO input file format, which has moved between VERSION 4.0 and VERSION 4.25 in both directions across this window. The package spends considerable effort on validation, version detection, and clear error messages when a file does not match.

◆ Where it's heading

The version-format churn is settling. Release 0.7.1 reverted the default back to VERSION 4.0 as a bugfix, and 0.9.0 finally set 4.25 as current while retaining a 4.0 compatibility string and improving the detection messages — a resolution rather than another reversal. With that stabilising, the substantive work has been the recruitment model coverage added in 0.8.0, which brought autocorrelated lognormal error structures into the package for the first time. Naming has been converging too, with output_stock_summary and summary_output_flag renamed to auxiliary variants to match the AGEPRO-GUI specification.

◆ Prediction

Expect the remaining recruitment models to be filled in against the AGEPRO specification, and the version handling to stay on 4.25 now that both formats are supported and validated rather than swapped.

S
shapviz
ANALYTICS
0.0

shapviz refines its SHAP plots release by release while chasing ggplot2's moving target.

◆ Current state

shapviz turns SHAP values from XGBoost, LightGBM, H2O, kernelshap and other sources into standard diagnostic plots — importance, dependence, waterfall, force and interaction. Recent work is plot ergonomics: shared y-axis control across dependence plots, a bar view for interaction values, and axis collection via patchwork. The two most recent releases are pure compatibility and bug fixes.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel here. One is visual refinement converging on conventions from Python's shap — the 0.10.0 notes openly float switching share_y to TRUE to match it. The other is connector maintenance, keeping pace with H2O, XGBoost 1.x and 2.x, shapr and permshap as each changes. Neither thread adds new explanation methods; shapviz's job is presentation, and it is being polished rather than extended.

◆ Prediction

Expect share_y = TRUE to become the default and further ggplot2 4.x fallout, with connector updates arriving as the upstream SHAP packages release.

Alternatives to ageproR and shapviz

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ageproR or shapviz.

See all ageproR alternatives → · See all shapviz alternatives →

Recent activity from ageproR and shapviz

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agoageproRwrite_inp option flag detection fixed after 0.8.0 dependency changes
  2. 6mo agoageproRAGEPRO VERSION 4.25 becomes the default format, with 4.0 kept compatible
  3. 10mo agoshapvizggplot 4.0 compatibility fix
  4. 1y agoageproRFour recruitment models added, including autocorrelated lognormal error
  5. 1y agoshapvizFixes duplicated bars in sv_interaction()
  6. 1y agoshapvizggplot2 and patchwork dependency bumps
  7. 1y agoshapvizShared y-axis control and bar-style interaction plots
  8. 1y agoageproRagepro_inp_model initialisation aligned with the other model classes
  9. 1y agoshapvizH2O random forests gain TreeSHAP support
  10. 1y agoshapvizFixes a broken vignette link
  11. 1y agoageproRVersion string read from line 1; invalid recruitment data blocks export
  12. 1y agoageproRInput file format reverted to VERSION 4.0 as a bugfix

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ageproR and shapviz?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ageproR and shapviz are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ageproR better than shapviz?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ageproR and shapviz are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ageproR?

Top ageproR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ageproR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/agepror-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to shapviz?

Top shapviz alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "shapviz alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/shapviz for the full list with editorial commentary on each.