← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

aftables vs checkhelper

A side-by-side editorial comparison of aftables and checkhelper — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

aftables vs checkhelper: at a glance

Featureaftablescheckhelper
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesaccessibility, spreadsheets, government-statistics, openxlsx2r-packages, cran-compliance, static-analysis, developer-tools
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is aftables?

Accessible government spreadsheets in R, rebuilt on openxlsx2 and renamed along the way.

aftables generates spreadsheets that meet the UK Analysis Function's accessibility guidance, taking structured input and producing a formatted workbook with cover, contents, notes and table sheets. Version 2.0.0 replaced the workbook engine with openxlsx2 and added configuration through a config.yaml file, with create_config_yaml() exporting a template and generate_workbook() gaining arguments to point at it. The package was previously called a11ytables and was renamed in 1.0.2, with function names changed to match.

Read the full aftables trajectory →

What is checkhelper?

checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.

1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.

Read the full checkhelper trajectory →

aftables vs checkhelper: editorial side-by-side

A
aftables
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Accessible government spreadsheets in R, rebuilt on openxlsx2 and renamed along the way.

◆ Current state

aftables generates spreadsheets that meet the UK Analysis Function's accessibility guidance, taking structured input and producing a formatted workbook with cover, contents, notes and table sheets. Version 2.0.0 replaced the workbook engine with openxlsx2 and added configuration through a config.yaml file, with create_config_yaml() exporting a template and generate_workbook() gaining arguments to point at it. The package was previously called a11ytables and was renamed in 1.0.2, with function names changed to match.

◆ Where it's heading

The history reads in two phases. As a11ytables the work was about what belongs in an accessible spreadsheet, adding arbitrary pre-table metadata rows and enforcing rules such as rejecting tab titles that start with a numeral. Since the rename the work has been structural: a new backend, and configuration moved out of function arguments into a file that can be version-controlled and shared across a team. That second phase suits the audience, since government analysts producing recurring statistical releases want the same document properties applied every time rather than re-specified per run.

◆ Prediction

Expect the config.yaml surface to grow to cover more of what is currently passed as arguments, given it arrived alongside alternative author, title and keywords arguments that it plainly supersedes. With the openxlsx2 migration complete, further releases are likely to be formatting fixes surfaced by real departmental publications, as 2.0.1 already was.

C
checkhelper
INFRA · APIS
2.5

checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.

◆ Current state

1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.

◆ Where it's heading

The design commitment is static analysis — AST walks via getParseData(), line-by-line Rd reading, no eval() and no namespace loading — so the tool can report on a package it never runs. That commitment is what made the roxygen2 8.x break survivable: the audit pipeline itself was verified correct under 8.1.0 and only the test scaffolding had to go, now guarded by a dedicated regression test. fix_globals(write = TRUE) is being sanded down in parallel, no longer flattening per-function grouping comments or writing a degenerate empty globalVariables() shell.

◆ Prediction

The immediate move is the 1.0.1 submission itself, clearing the archival notice. Beyond that, each additional CRAN incoming-check rule remains a candidate for another audit_* function; the open question these notes still leave is whether the family ever gets a single combined entry point.

Alternatives to aftables and checkhelper

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either aftables or checkhelper.

See all aftables alternatives → · See all checkhelper alternatives →

Recent activity from aftables and checkhelper

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agocheckhelpercheckhelper 1.0.1 rc1 (CRAN submission candidate)
  2. 3mo agocheckhelperA static audit_* family for CRAN pre-submission checks
  3. 4mo agoaftablesrlang import restored for older R versions
  4. 5mo agoaftablesWorkbook engine moved to openxlsx2; config.yaml introduced
  5. 1y agoaftablesPackage renamed from a11ytables to aftables
  6. 2y agoaftablesTab titles beginning with a numeral now rejected
  7. 2y agocheckhelperTest fixes for roxygen2 changes
  8. 2y agoaftablescustom_rows allows arbitrary pre-table metadata
  9. 2y agoaftablesTable count spelled out; README spelling corrected
  10. 3y agocheckhelpercheckhelper 0.1.0 - First CRAN Release

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between aftables and checkhelper?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is aftables better than checkhelper?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to aftables?

Top aftables alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "aftables alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/aftables for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to checkhelper?

Top checkhelper alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "checkhelper alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/checkhelper for the full list with editorial commentary on each.