← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

affiner vs fastplyr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of affiner and fastplyr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

affiner vs fastplyr: at a glance

Featureaffinerfastplyr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, computational-geometry, grid-graphics, affine-transformsdataframe-performance, dplyr-alternative, query-optimization, cran-policy
Last editorial update44m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is affiner?

affiner is quietly turning a grid transformation helper into a small computational geometry library.

An R package that began as a wrapper around grid's affine transformation primitives, with an angle vector class supporting degrees, radians, half-turns, turns and gradians so users need not convert by hand. Four releases in roughly eighteen months. The recent two have expanded well past that starting point into geometric objects and the predicates that operate on them.

Read the full affiner trajectory →

What is fastplyr?

A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.

fastplyr reimplements the dplyr verbs on a faster backend, exposing f_summarise, f_mutate, f_reframe and a set of group metadata helpers alongside optimized joins and quantiles. The most recent release removes non-API C functions and raises the floor to R 4.5.0, a steep requirement that follows the C++17 requirement introduced a release earlier. The verb surface itself has been stable since 0.9.0.

Read the full fastplyr trajectory →

affiner vs fastplyr: editorial side-by-side

A
affiner
ANALYTICS
0.0

affiner is quietly turning a grid transformation helper into a small computational geometry library.

◆ Current state

An R package that began as a wrapper around grid's affine transformation primitives, with an angle vector class supporting degrees, radians, half-turns, turns and gradians so users need not convert by hand. Four releases in roughly eighteen months. The recent two have expanded well past that starting point into geometric objects and the predicates that operate on them.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is clear from the order things arrived. Version 0.2.1 added the predicate layer first — has_intersection(), intersection(), is_equivalent() and is_parallel() as S3 generics working across angle vectors, points, lines and planes. Version 0.3.1 then supplied the objects those generics need, with Ellipse2D, Polygon2D and Segment2D R6 classes plus constructors for rectangles, regular n-gons and isotoxal star polygons, and dot products at one, two and three dimensions. Building the operations before the shapes is unusual ordering but it means each new object type arrives already composable with everything else.

◆ Prediction

Expect more 2D and 3D object types filling out the same generic interface, and the geometry side to keep outgrowing the grid-transformation wrapper the package was named for.

F
fastplyr
ANALYTICS
0.0

A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.

◆ Current state

fastplyr reimplements the dplyr verbs on a faster backend, exposing f_summarise, f_mutate, f_reframe and a set of group metadata helpers alongside optimized joins and quantiles. The most recent release removes non-API C functions and raises the floor to R 4.5.0, a steep requirement that follows the C++17 requirement introduced a release earlier. The verb surface itself has been stable since 0.9.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The optimization strategy has shifted from making individual functions fast to reasoning about expressions before evaluating them — 0.9.9 began marking simple operators as group-unaware so expressions built only from them are evaluated across the whole data frame rather than per group. That is a structural bet: the package increasingly inspects what you wrote to decide how much work is actually needed. Running alongside it is a steady tightening of build requirements, with C++17, R 4.5.0 and CRAN's C API rules all landing within a year.

◆ Prediction

Expect the group-unaware classification to widen to more functions, since each addition compounds across every grouped expression, and expect the dependency floors to keep rising as the package tracks CRAN's compiled-code policy.

Alternatives to affiner and fastplyr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either affiner or fastplyr.

See all affiner alternatives → · See all fastplyr alternatives →

Recent activity from affiner and fastplyr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agoaffinerEllipse, polygon and segment objects, with star and n-gon constructors
  2. 4mo agofastplyrNon-API C functions dropped, R 4.5.0 now required
  3. 6mo agoaffinerIntersection, equivalence and parallelism generics across geometric types
  4. 8mo agofastplyrIn-place sorting arrives with a C++17 requirement
  5. 10mo agofastplyrGroup-unaware expressions evaluated on the whole frame
  6. 1y agofastplyrf_mutate and f_reframe complete the verb set
  7. 1y agoaffinerIsocube border fill forced transparent
  8. 1y agofastplyrDynamic argument evaluation and f_pull
  9. 1y agofastplyrf_fill added and grouped joins repaired
  10. 1y agoaffinerInitial release: affine grob wrappers and multi-unit angle vectors

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between affiner and fastplyr?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. affiner and fastplyr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is affiner better than fastplyr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. affiner and fastplyr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to affiner?

Top affiner alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "affiner alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/affiner-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to fastplyr?

Top fastplyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastplyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastplyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.