← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

abclass vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of abclass and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

abclass vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featureabclassrempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesclassification, regularization, large-margin classifiers, cran maintenanceapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update1h ago44m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is abclass?

abclass built out angle-based classifiers in 2022, then went quiet except for CRAN upkeep.

An implementation of multi-category angle-based large-margin classifiers with regularization. The capability was assembled in four releases across 2022: group lasso, then group SCAD and MCP penalties, then sparse matrix input, cross-validation via cv.abclass(), an efficient tuning path in et.abclass(), and experimental sup-norm classifiers. After a three-year gap, 0.5.0 simplified how group penalties are specified and 0.5.1 swapped the quadratic programming backend after qpmadr was archived on CRAN.

Read the full abclass trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

abclass vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

A
abclass
ANALYTICS
0.0

abclass built out angle-based classifiers in 2022, then went quiet except for CRAN upkeep.

◆ Current state

An implementation of multi-category angle-based large-margin classifiers with regularization. The capability was assembled in four releases across 2022: group lasso, then group SCAD and MCP penalties, then sparse matrix input, cross-validation via cv.abclass(), an efficient tuning path in et.abclass(), and experimental sup-norm classifiers. After a three-year gap, 0.5.0 simplified how group penalties are specified and 0.5.1 swapped the quadratic programming backend after qpmadr was archived on CRAN.

◆ Where it's heading

The methods surface is complete and the package has moved into maintenance, where releases are triggered by the R ecosystem rather than by research. The one structural habit worth noting is a willingness to change defaults — alpha, epsilon, lum_c and now the cross-validation alignment have all shifted between versions, so results are not stable across upgrades unless arguments are set explicitly.

◆ Prediction

Expect further releases to track CRAN dependency changes, as 0.5.1 did within a day of qpmadr's archival; nothing in the entries points to new penalty families.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to abclass and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either abclass or rempsyc.

See all abclass alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from abclass and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 7mo agoabclassQuadratic programming backend swapped after CRAN archival
  2. 10mo agoabclassGroup penalty specification simplified
  3. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  4. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  5. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  6. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  7. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  8. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically
  9. 3y agoabclassSparse input, cross-validation and efficient tuning added
  10. 4y agoabclassGroup SCAD and MCP penalties added
  11. 4y agoabclassGroup lasso regularization and correctness fixes
  12. 4y agoabclassFirst release of the angle-based classifiers

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between abclass and rempsyc?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. abclass and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is abclass better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. abclass and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to abclass?

Top abclass alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "abclass alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/abclass for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.