← Back to analytics tools
Alternatives · analytics tools

timetk alternatives

The best timetk alternatives in analytics tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.

Updated Aug 13, 2026

Looking for the best alternatives to timetk? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in analytics tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, timetk shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 0.0 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.

About timetk

timetk swallowed anomalize whole, then went quiet for two years

timetk handles time series wrangling, visualization, and feature engineering in a tidyverse idiom. Its defining recent move was absorbing the anomalize package outright in 2.9.0, bringing anomaly detection, cleaning, and the associated plots inside timetk rather than leaving them in a sibling package. Development then paused for nearly two years before 2.9.1, a robustness and documentation release.

Velocity 0.0 · Last update 1h ago

Read the full timetk trajectory →

Top 12 alternatives to timetk

Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.

Browse all analytics tools products →

timetk vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance

Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.

ProductVelocitySparks · 30dFocus areasLatest release
timetk (baseline)0.00time-seriesanomaly-detectionvisualizationtimetk 2.9.0 absorbs the anomalize package
writexl6.31xlsxlibxlsxwritercell-formattingwritexl 2.0.0 adds formatting, comments and full libxlsxwriter coverage
mlr3viz2.50mlr3visualizationggplot2
mlr3tuning2.50mlr3hyperparameter-tuningasync-optimization
mlr3mbo2.50bayesian-optimizationmlr3hyperparameter-tuningmlr3mbo 1.0.0 ships benchmark-derived default settings
rnaturalearth0.00spatial-datanatural-earthsf-migration
rgbif0.00gbifbiodiversity-databulk-downloadsrgbif 3.8.1 adds SQL-based occurrence downloads
rstanarm0.00bayesianstanregression-models
taxa0.00taxonomyvctrsstalled-rewritetaxa 0.4.0 begins a base-R-vector rewrite without taxmap
rotl0.00open-tree-of-lifetaxonomic-matchingreproducibility
taxize0.00taxonomyapi-aggregationupstream-churn
osmdata0.00openstreetmapoverpass-apispatial-data
posterior0.00bayesianrvarpareto-diagnostics

The 12 best timetk alternatives, in depth

1. writexl · velocity 6.3

Writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.

Over the last 30 days writexl shipped 1 meaningful update vs timetk's 0, most recently “writexl 2.0.0 adds formatting, comments and full libxlsxwriter coverage”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, writexl focuses on xlsx, libxlsxwriter and cell formatting.

Over the last 30 days writexl has been shipping faster than timetk — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

2. mlr3viz · velocity 2.5

Mlr3viz keeps the ecosystem's plots working while the plots themselves move out.

Its velocity score of 2.5/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, mlr3viz focuses on mlr3, visualization and ggplot2.

mlr3viz and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

3. mlr3tuning · velocity 2.5

Mlr3tuning is rebuilding its async machinery under a stable public surface.

Its velocity score of 2.5/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, mlr3tuning focuses on mlr3, hyperparameter tuning and async optimization.

mlr3tuning and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

4. mlr3mbo · velocity 2.5

Mlr3mbo picked its defaults from a benchmark study, not from taste.

Its velocity score of 2.5/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “mlr3mbo 1.0.0 ships benchmark-derived default settings”.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, mlr3mbo focuses on bayesian optimization, mlr3 and hyperparameter tuning.

mlr3mbo and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

5. rnaturalearth · velocity 0.0

Rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, rnaturalearth focuses on spatial data, natural earth and sf migration.

rnaturalearth and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

6. rgbif · velocity 0.0

Rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “rgbif 3.8.1 adds SQL-based occurrence downloads”.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, rgbif focuses on gbif, biodiversity data and bulk downloads.

rgbif and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

7. rstanarm · velocity 0.0

Rstanarm is community-maintained now, tracking Stan and lme4 rather than adding models.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, rstanarm focuses on bayesian, stan and regression models.

rstanarm and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

8. taxa · velocity 0.0

Taxa started a ground-up rewrite in 2021 and has published almost nothing since.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “taxa 0.4.0 begins a base-R-vector rewrite without taxmap”.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, taxa focuses on taxonomy, vctrs and stalled rewrite.

taxa and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

9. rotl · velocity 0.0

Rotl's whole release history is keeping name matching honest against a moving taxonomy.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, rotl focuses on open tree of life, taxonomic matching and reproducibility.

rotl and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

10. taxize · velocity 0.0

Taxize spends its releases absorbing other people's API changes, one dead source at a time.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, taxize focuses on taxonomy, api aggregation and upstream churn.

taxize and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

11. osmdata · velocity 0.0

Osmdata keeps tightening its Overpass query surface, breaking small things to get types right.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, osmdata focuses on openstreetmap, overpass api and spatial data.

osmdata and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

12. posterior · velocity 0.0

Posterior keeps deepening two things: the rvar type and Pareto-based diagnostics.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where timetk leans on time series, anomaly detection and visualization, posterior focuses on bayesian, rvar and pareto diagnostics.

posterior and timetk have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

Frequently asked questions

What are the best alternatives to timetk?

The top timetk alternatives we currently track in analytics tools are writexl, mlr3viz, mlr3tuning, mlr3mbo, rnaturalearth, ranked by recent ship velocity.

How is this list of timetk alternatives ranked?

Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.

Can I compare timetk directly with one of these alternatives?

Yes — every card has a "Compare with timetk" link to a side-by-side /compare page.